The 2001 session of the General Assembly
is underway and although were only in the first full week, there are some clear
signals heralding what awaits ahead. There is no question that this session will be ruled
by the budgetor, more precisely, the economic slowdown experienced throughout the
state. Revenues in the Commonwealth, although still up, are lower than originally
projected and the potential shortfall will effect much of this years legislation.
Already we have been warned that money is
not available in the budget sent to the General Assembly from the Governor for any
teachers raises or museum, arts and cultural programs. Money has also been stripped
or severely cut from programs already scheduled to receive dollars. Those programs
include, but are not limited to: road construction, land conservation, school construction
and mental health programs. Our future rests on our teachers and the Commonwealth owes it
to every parent & child to make certain that the teaching profession attracts and
keeps the very best. Cultural programs not only preserve our past, they are a potent
resource for community dollars. Along with those two vital, overlooked programs, last
session the General Assembly earmarked specific funds for road projects, established a
land conservation account and provided allocations for school construction that have been
greatly reduced in this years budget. Mental health funding, although increased
every year, is facing changes at the federal level and the Commonwealth must remain
vigilant. Promises were made to Virginia citizens and we must continue to stand behind our
commitment. Much of my time will be centered on ensuring that money for all those areas is
integrated back into the budget.
The primary budget issue facing the
General Assembly will no doubt be the funding related to the car tax. The original 1999
legislation to phase-out the car tax contained financial triggers in order to ensure that
established projects, programs and obligations like those mentioned earlier would not be
placed in jeopardy if revenue fell short. That revenue shortfall is the situation before
us today. The Governor has proposed that we draw down one-time future money expected from
the National Tobacco Settlement to bring the budget figures up to continue funding for the
car tax. This approach of issuing debt and borrowing against future revenue represents a
significant shift in the way Virginia analyzes and balances the budget. I have grave
concerns about creating a "paper-picture" of the Commonwealth that does not
accurately reflect the true budget reality of the state of the Commonwealth.
I am acutely aware of how important car
tax relief is to many Virginians. It was, indeed, a voter consent bill. In looking at the
data we have for the car tax, there is considerable evidence that the benefits of this tax
refund rest primarily with the eastern--wealthier and more populated--areas of the state.
Fairfax County has 14% of the states population but enjoys 23% of the car tax relief
funds. In 1999, vehicle owners in Fairfax County received an average of $70 per car.
Comparable information was not available for Giles County in 1999, but the average refund
for Giles County in 2000 was $14.00
I will look closely at all the measures
which address the car tax and weigh that minimal tax cut against other, far more pressing
concerns that may be facing the New River Valley and the Commonwealth.
As usual, I hope if you have questions or
concerns about legislation mentioned in this column or any other legislative matter, you
will not hesitate to contact me at any of the following Richmond addresses.